Square Dance Stuff
Sep. 14th, 2007 10:59 pmSo, I thought about answers to comments on my last post about our recruitment efforts until that post was, in livejournal time, ancient history, so I will respond with a fresh post.
I take being president of Puddletown Squares really seriously. Probably a little two seriously, since in order to maintain and grow the club, I've realized that I have turned it into a part-time job. (unpaid of course.)
Even before I became president, I was reading as much as I could about both the history of square dancing, and the future. Interviews with the men who created what became Modern Western Square Dancing (MWSD), and Callerlab's reports and studies have informed much of the reason I am leading the club in the direction I am (and fuels my continuing frustration with our stuck in the past parent organization, Puddletown Dancers.)
1. The rush to higher levels has always been a problem.
2. There are too many other activities competing for people's time for MWSDing to seem like an attractive activity.
3. We are aging and not attracting younger members.
They are all interrelated. The rush to higher levels causes a lack of leadership around maintaining a vibrant mainstream program. Callers hang out with their friends who are interested in the mechanics of square dancing, which generally means other challenge dancers. Challenge dancing starts to seem like the -real- square dancing. When the leadership of clubs is made up of people who have the powerful mental "geometry engines" that challenge dancing requires, and have lives structured around making time to feed that interest, the needs of people who just want to -dance- a couple times a month and will never -really- understand Spin Chain Thru, seem far away.
But without someone to maintain that vibrant and active set of lower levels, those people who are capable of high level dancing, and would potentially fall in love with the challenge of learning new calls, don't get the support they need and drop out. Or they never join at all. Or they learn to hate square dancing because they are being forced through a compressed class and can't keep up.
The other factor in maintaining an active Mainstream level, is making sure that once people do get through the lessons, they can stop in anytime. If the whole club moves on to Plus while they are on a business trip, then we loose them as dancers. People have too many other drags on their time to expect them to keep learning levels. If they really love it, they will move on when they can. But if they just think it is fun and enjoy the socializing, then there should be a place for them too because even if they never move on, they may not only be a lot of fun, but they might eventually bring a friend who becomes a mainstay of the club.
Which brings us to number three. If we only recruit our friends, we will suffer the same fate as the straight clubs. Our friends are the same ages as we are, and as we get older, our peer group does too. Just in the five years that I have been in Puddletown, the club has aged considerably. The square are slowing down and the floor level keeps dropping. The average age of the membership is 50+. When Puddletown started 25 years ago, it was 25-30.
With Justin moving to Salt Lake (he and Ross are going to start a club there, so there is a silver lining as much as I will miss them...and I am really going to miss them. After Ron, Ross is the person I am closest to in Seattle.) I am now the youngest member of the club, and I am 43. Why would anyone in their 20s want to dance with a bunch of old people?
So, to answer
kent4str, It is a country wide thing that recruiting is so bad. There is too much competition for other things to do and their is no way to prove our value without getting people up and dancing. And if we can't tear them away from American Idol, we can't get them dancing.
And while
deege and
placeintheheart have good recruiting ideas aimed at getting people we know involved, they don't address the long term problem of keeping the clubs themselves young and growing. It just holds off the inevitable a little longer. (I like the idea that
fuzzygruf passed on of offering something for coming to open house events. I will have to think on that.) I feel like it is my job as president to think as long term as I can, and I don't like what I see in the future if we keep going the way we are.
We also have a huge hurdle to overcome, and that is the reputation of square dancing being a hick activity for old people in ugly costumes. The straight dancers don't do us any favors by holding onto the costumes that haven't changed much since the 70s. When we approach people at Pride to hand out flyers, they laugh at us. What could be more stupid than square dancing? And really, when your only exposure to it is seeing overweight, 80 year old women in a costumes reminiscent of something you would find in a fetish shop, sort of a cross between a cheerleader outfit and a french maid's uniform (what exactly goes on at those snowbird RV parks? Maybe I don't want to know...) all done in gingham and bows...well, who can blame them?
So, anyway, a long story to explain why I am pushing Community Square Dancing. Most people don't feel like they have time for another activity. But square dancing is really fun, whether you are in it for the dancing or the problem solving, or a little of both. If we can get them out dancing, even if it is a different form of our activity, it will start to change minds. Some people will want more and those people we can introduce to MWSD. It will also attract a more diverse, and hopefully younger crowd, which will keep the club itself young, rather than in decline.
It is also for selfish reasons. I really love square dancing, and I think MWSD is really really fun. But I am tired of shuffling around the floor. I want to MOVE. And if that is going to happen, we need a younger group of people that we are not reaching at all now.
I take being president of Puddletown Squares really seriously. Probably a little two seriously, since in order to maintain and grow the club, I've realized that I have turned it into a part-time job. (unpaid of course.)
Even before I became president, I was reading as much as I could about both the history of square dancing, and the future. Interviews with the men who created what became Modern Western Square Dancing (MWSD), and Callerlab's reports and studies have informed much of the reason I am leading the club in the direction I am (and fuels my continuing frustration with our stuck in the past parent organization, Puddletown Dancers.)
1. The rush to higher levels has always been a problem.
2. There are too many other activities competing for people's time for MWSDing to seem like an attractive activity.
3. We are aging and not attracting younger members.
They are all interrelated. The rush to higher levels causes a lack of leadership around maintaining a vibrant mainstream program. Callers hang out with their friends who are interested in the mechanics of square dancing, which generally means other challenge dancers. Challenge dancing starts to seem like the -real- square dancing. When the leadership of clubs is made up of people who have the powerful mental "geometry engines" that challenge dancing requires, and have lives structured around making time to feed that interest, the needs of people who just want to -dance- a couple times a month and will never -really- understand Spin Chain Thru, seem far away.
But without someone to maintain that vibrant and active set of lower levels, those people who are capable of high level dancing, and would potentially fall in love with the challenge of learning new calls, don't get the support they need and drop out. Or they never join at all. Or they learn to hate square dancing because they are being forced through a compressed class and can't keep up.
The other factor in maintaining an active Mainstream level, is making sure that once people do get through the lessons, they can stop in anytime. If the whole club moves on to Plus while they are on a business trip, then we loose them as dancers. People have too many other drags on their time to expect them to keep learning levels. If they really love it, they will move on when they can. But if they just think it is fun and enjoy the socializing, then there should be a place for them too because even if they never move on, they may not only be a lot of fun, but they might eventually bring a friend who becomes a mainstay of the club.
Which brings us to number three. If we only recruit our friends, we will suffer the same fate as the straight clubs. Our friends are the same ages as we are, and as we get older, our peer group does too. Just in the five years that I have been in Puddletown, the club has aged considerably. The square are slowing down and the floor level keeps dropping. The average age of the membership is 50+. When Puddletown started 25 years ago, it was 25-30.
With Justin moving to Salt Lake (he and Ross are going to start a club there, so there is a silver lining as much as I will miss them...and I am really going to miss them. After Ron, Ross is the person I am closest to in Seattle.) I am now the youngest member of the club, and I am 43. Why would anyone in their 20s want to dance with a bunch of old people?
So, to answer
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
And while
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
We also have a huge hurdle to overcome, and that is the reputation of square dancing being a hick activity for old people in ugly costumes. The straight dancers don't do us any favors by holding onto the costumes that haven't changed much since the 70s. When we approach people at Pride to hand out flyers, they laugh at us. What could be more stupid than square dancing? And really, when your only exposure to it is seeing overweight, 80 year old women in a costumes reminiscent of something you would find in a fetish shop, sort of a cross between a cheerleader outfit and a french maid's uniform (what exactly goes on at those snowbird RV parks? Maybe I don't want to know...) all done in gingham and bows...well, who can blame them?
So, anyway, a long story to explain why I am pushing Community Square Dancing. Most people don't feel like they have time for another activity. But square dancing is really fun, whether you are in it for the dancing or the problem solving, or a little of both. If we can get them out dancing, even if it is a different form of our activity, it will start to change minds. Some people will want more and those people we can introduce to MWSD. It will also attract a more diverse, and hopefully younger crowd, which will keep the club itself young, rather than in decline.
It is also for selfish reasons. I really love square dancing, and I think MWSD is really really fun. But I am tired of shuffling around the floor. I want to MOVE. And if that is going to happen, we need a younger group of people that we are not reaching at all now.